HCM102 Organizational Citizenship in Banking Sector of Saudi Arabia
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
HCM102 Organizational Citizenship in Banking Sector of Saudi Arabia
Please read carefully the “Discussion” section of the given below research study and identify which factors are significantly related and which were not related to organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) by summarizing the discussion section.
Also, summarize “Table 1” in your own words based on the diversity of the respondents.
Rasheed, A., Jehanzeb, K., & Rasheed, M. F. (2013). An investigation of the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour: Case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5(1), 128.
HLTH3350 Health Report Paper
Learning Goal: I’m working on a population health report and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
HLTH 3350: CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATICS eHealth Intervention
Now that you have your underserved population (the underserved population that the elderly African American patient aged 65 years and above) and your needs analysis (attached below), it is now time to develop your eHealth intervention.
Part 1 – Develop your eHealth Intervention application design concept
Describe the intended user(s) of the applications, and the need(s) that the application attempts to meet.
Specify the intervention strategy used in the application
Describe the application’s technological platform (e.g., web, iPhone), and any platformfeatures employed by the application (e.g., sensing, texting, cameras, Internet access).
Describe the content and features of the application.
Drawing from your scenarios and persona, describe in detail when, how and by whom
the application will be used.
Part 2 – Implementation issues analysis
Describe 3-4 adoption barriers that your CHI application might encounter, and how you will address these barriers in your design, and/or in implementation plans.
Part 3 – Evaluation Describe an evaluation plan for your CHI application, including an evaluation research question and a type of evaluation based on those outlined in the following course readings:
Enam, A., Torres-Bonilla, J., & Eriksson, H. (2018). Evidence-Based Evaluation of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Literature Review. Journal Of Medical Internet Research, 20(11), e10971. https://doi.org/10.2196/10971
- Eysenbach, G. (2005). Design and Evaluation of Consumer Health Information Web Sites. In D. Lewis, G. Eysenbach, R. Kukafka, Z. Stavri & H. Jimison, Title: Consumer Health Informatics : Informing Consumers and Improving Health Care (pp. 49-59). Springer.
Poppe, L., Plaete, J., Huys, N., Verloigne, M., Deveugele, M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., &Crombez, G. (2018). Process Evaluation of an eHealth Intervention Implemented intoGeneral Practice: General Practitioners’ and Patients’ Views. International Journal OfEnvironmental Research And Public Health, 15(7), 1475.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071475F
Final DocumentPrepare a 6-9-page document that includes the following sections:
3-5-page application design concept
2-3-page implementation issues analysis
1-page evaluation
Paper should be typed, using 11–12-point font, 1” margins and 1.5 line spacing. The paper should be formatted per APA 7th Edition guidelines (Title page, in-text citations, and reference list).
You will need to include:
– Title Page
-eHealth Intervention
– Introduction
– Application Design Concept Description
-Implementation Issues Analysis
– Evaluation
– Conclusion
– Reference list
You will not need: Running header or Page numbers
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow HCM102 Organizational Citizenship in Banking Sector of Saudi Arabia
HCM102 Organizational Citizenship in Banking Sector of Saudi Arabia