HMDV 190 Human Development Childhood Education Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
HMDV 190 Human Development Childhood Education Paper
HMDV 190 Human Development Childhood Education Paper
Throughout the semester students will examine the history of childcare and education. Students will research the current state of childcare. Students may research current and potential
propositions affecting early childhood education or any topic of interest the education field in general ( TK, Full day Kinder vs. Part day, Dual Language Programs, NCLB, Common Core) Paper
requirements: • Current state of childcare is described and related to concepts discussed throughout paper ( your introduction) – 20 points •Propositions/ Topic of Interest- Identify and describe
at least 3 examples to support your topic relating to early education or the education system as a whole. Explain in detail the goal of the proposition or topic and how they will impact the field.
Describe the benefits and deficits of each as well as how they are affecting the elementary education system. Provide an alternative solution or modification to improve each policy or program.
HMDV 190 Human Development Childhood Education Paper
HMDV 190 Human Development Childhood Education Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow