Horizontal Partitioning in DBMS
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Horizontal Partitioning in DBMS
Horizontal partitioning, also known as sharding, is a database partitioning technique used in database management systems (DBMS) to improve performance and scalability. In this technique, a large database table is split into multiple smaller tables called partitions or shards, each of which contains a subset of the original table’s rows.
Each partition is stored on a separate physical server or storage device, allowing multiple servers to work together to process queries in parallel. This can significantly improve performance, particularly for large-scale applications with heavy read and write loads.
There are several ways to partition a database horizontally. One approach is to use a range-based partitioning scheme, where rows are distributed across partitions based on a specific range of values in a designated column. For example, a customer database could be partitioned by the first letter of the customer’s last name, with all customers whose last name begins with “A” stored in one partition and those whose last name begins with “B” stored in another.
Another approach is to use a hash-based partitioning scheme, where rows are distributed across partitions based on the output of a hash function applied to a designated column. This ensures that rows are distributed evenly across partitions, regardless of their actual values.
Horizontal partitioning can be particularly useful for applications with rapidly growing data sets, as it allows the database to scale horizontally by adding more servers to the cluster as needed. This can be done without requiring significant changes to the application code, as the database appears as a single logical entity to the application regardless of how it is physically partitioned.
However, horizontal partitioning can also introduce some challenges. For example, queries that span multiple partitions can be more complex and potentially slower than those that only access a single partition. In addition, ensuring data consistency across partitions can be more difficult, particularly in the case of updates or deletes that affect multiple partitions.
To address these challenges, DBMSs typically provide additional features to support horizontal partitioning. For example, many DBMSs support distributed transactions that allow updates to be coordinated across multiple partitions in a transactional manner. Some systems also provide automatic partition management, where partitions can be created or merged dynamically based on changes in the data set.
Overall, horizontal partitioning is a powerful technique for improving the scalability and performance of database applications. By distributing data across multiple servers and allowing queries to be processed in parallel, it can enable applications to handle large data sets with high throughput and low latency. However, it is important to carefully consider the tradeoffs and potential challenges associated with this technique before implementing it in a production environment.
Horizontal Partitioning in DBMS
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow