Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
HPM 284: Journal Article Critique
Assignment: Critically evaluate your assigned journal article. Collaboration with other students is allowed but the submitted critique must be your own. Please note that you will be expected to have read both articles, as we will discuss them in class.
Write a 3 page double-spaced review in at least 11-point font with the following structure:
I. Provide a brief summary of the article (3-4 sentences) that includes the objective, what intervention was being evaluated, the study design and the overall result.
II. Evaluate the following specific elements of the article:
Significance: Comment on the relevance of this intervention how important is the question the authors seek to answer?
Innovation: Comment on the extent to which the study tests new paradigms or uses cutting edge techniques.
Approach: Discuss relevant information about the study design, intervention, and outcome. Questions you may wish to consider include:
Is the population in the study the population of interest?
Does the study provide high-quality evidence?
Is the intervention conceptually sound?
III. Summarize your overall impression of the article including 1) the main strengths and limitations of the study 2) whether the conclusions follow the study results and, 3) whether you think this intervention is scalable, sustainable, and/or feasible in other settings.
IV. Please think of 3 questions you have on your assigned article for discussion. These questions can be related to the intervention, the study design, or the statistical analysis plan.
Submission: Please submit your assignment in Canvas under the Assignment titled Critique by Friday, July 16th, 2021 at 11:59 PM EDT. Please dont forget to include your name at the top of your assignments.
Rather than living in chaos, danger, and the hostility of our neighbors, we find ways to live together. It isn’t easy, but can we avoid doing so?
If everybody has self-interest in their own welfare and safety, then everybody also has self-interest in the welfare and safety of others. Self-interest involves community interest, and we must think about what we are willing to give up in order to get that safety and stability for ourselves, our families, our community, our nation, and even the world.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are just two examples of social contract moralists. Locke’s philosophy helped Thomas Jefferson formulate the United States Declaration of Independence. We are interested in what it means to live together in an orderly way under a social contract.
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address one of the following sets of questions:
What is a time when you or someone you know of experienced a conflict between duty to self and loyalty to the community? What would logical reasoning say should be done in that case? Why that? What would an Ethical Egoist say to do? Why would they say to do that? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
What is a time when you or someone you know experienced a clash between professional duties and familial duties? Reference a professional code such as that of the American Nurses Association or American Bar Association in explaining the clash. What moral values should have been used in that case? Why those values? What would social contract ethics have said to have done? Why would social contract ethics say that? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
Articulate and evaluate a time when you or someone you know saw personal obligations collide with national obligations. How did that tension involve differing positions on a moral debate? Did those positions rely on any key moral theories? If so, how so? If not, why not? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
HPM 284 Journal Article Critique Essay Assignment |
HPM 284 Journal Article Critique Essay Assignment