Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
HUM 200 Project Part One Rough Draft
Overview: Now that you have chosen your artifacts and identified the common theme, you will develop a draft of your exploration document. Over the course of Theme: Examining the Humanities and Theme: Impact of the Humanities, you will walk through each step in the Soomo webtext and have an opportunity to incorporate instructor feedback before submitting your final version of the exploration document at the end of Theme: Impact of the Humanities.
Prompt: Analyze your two chosen artifacts. Then, identify a common theme and compare your examples to one another as expressions of the same theme in different cultural artifacts. To document your analysis and research, you will develop a reference list. In preparation for the presentation you will develop in Theme: Human Culture, you will also consider how you would present your research to a specific audience.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Explain how the theme you identified is related to your personal experience. For instance, you could discuss how the expression of the theme in your cultural artifacts is connected to you personally.
VII. Based on your research, develop a thesis statement that conveys the claim you plan to make about your theme and artifacts. Your thesis statement should be clear, specific, and arguable.
VIII. Based on your research, identify an audience that would be interested in your theme and thesis statement. For example, who would benefit most from hearing your message?
Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your exploration document rough draft should adhere to the following formatting requirements: 3 to 5 pages in length, double- spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. You should use current APA style guidelines (or another format approved by your instructor) for your citations and reference list.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Cultural Artifacts Describes selected cultural artifacts Describes selected cultural artifacts but with gaps in detail or clarity
Does not describe selected cultural artifacts
8
Common Theme Identifies at least one common theme to serve as framework of exploration document and explains how theme is expressed in artifacts
Identifies at least one common theme to serve as framework of exploration document and explains how theme is expressed in artifacts but with gaps in clarity or detail
Does not identify at least one common theme to serve as framework of exploration document and does not explain how theme is expressed in artifacts
8
Personal Experience Explains how identified theme is related to personal experience
Explains how identified theme is related to personal experience but with gaps in clarity or detail
Does not explain how identified theme is related to personal experience
8
Profession Discusses a profession that could be impacted by identified theme
Discusses a profession that could be impacted by identified theme but with gaps in clarity or detail
Does not discuss a profession that could be impacted by identified theme
8
Humanities Resources Describes at least three relevant and appropriate humanities resources that could be used to investigate theme and artifacts
Describes at least three humanities resources that could be used to investigate theme and artifacts but with gaps in appropriateness, relevance, or detail
Does not describe at least three humanities resources that could be used to investigate theme and artifacts
8
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Research: Historical Context
Discusses relationship between each cultural artifact and its historical context, citing sources
Discusses relationship between each cultural artifact and its historical context but with gaps in detail, clarity, or citation
Does not discuss relationship between each cultural artifact and its historical context
8
Research: Similarities and Differences
Explains similarities and differences observed in cultural artifacts in relation to theme, citing sources
Explains similarities and differences observed in cultural artifacts but not in relation to theme or with gaps in detail, clarity, or citation
Does not explain similarities and differences observed in cultural artifacts
8
Research: Medium Discusses the medium through which cultural artifacts were created, citing sources
Discusses the medium through which cultural artifacts were created but with gaps in detail, clarity, or citation
Does not discuss the medium through which cultural artifacts were created
8
Thesis Statement Develops clear, specific, and arguable thesis statement that conveys claim about theme and artifacts, based on research
Develops thesis statement that conveys claim about theme and artifacts but thesis statement is not based on research, lacks clarity or specificity, or is not arguable
Does not develop thesis statement that conveys claim about theme and artifacts
8
Audience Identifies an audience that would be interested in theme and thesis statement, based on research
Identifies an audience but audience is not appropriate for theme and thesis statement or is not based on research
Does not identify an audience 8
Message Describes how and why message can be tailored to audience, providing specific examples based on research
Describes how and why message can be tailored to audience but with gaps in examples or research support
Does not describe how and why message can be tailored to audience
8
Reference List Provides reference list that includes all humanities resources used to research artifacts, theme, and thesis statement, ensuring that list is formatted according to current APA guidelines
Provides reference list that includes all humanities resources used to research artifacts, theme, and thesis statement, but list has gaps in adherence to current APA formatting guidelines
Does not provide reference list that includes all humanities resources used to research artifacts, theme, and thesis statement
8
Articulation of Response
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
4
Total 100%
HUM 200 Project Part One Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Rubric
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
HUM 200 Project Part One Rough Draft |
HUM 200 Project Part One Rough Draft