Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
IKEA Risk Assessment And Management
Keep in mind that raising the firm’s value does not always imply extending the company. Value improvement may entail acquiring other businesses, performing research and development, or introducing new products and services, while in other circumstances it may imply downsizing, rightsizing, or even refining the firm’s offerings.
Reconsider the strategic alternatives and financial analysis suggestions that give the most chances to add value to your company in a 1,500-word report, and examine the risks of each. Use what you’ve learned about your company’s business model, industry, competitors, and target market to help you.
You used a SWOT analysis to assess the advantages and disadvantages of prospective growth prospects and strategies for your company in the Strategic Alternatives Assessment. Recap your findings in this section, along with any instructor criticism, describing how you came up with your proposed strategic alternative(s) and calculated potential inhibitors for each. Include financial considerations in your earliest proposed choices.
You have prepared and submitted reports for your firm based on information that you and your CLC group have gathered and assessed throughout the course. However, it’s also crucial to think about what other information you may have found that would have helped you formulate recommendations. What information is missing that may help you and your team build and propose value-adding strategic alternatives?
What information do you need to help you and your team better analyze and manage the risks associated with the recommended alternatives?
When it comes to presenting strategic recommendations to management, the feasibility and viability of the available options are heavily influenced by financial concerns. Return to the Financial Analysis assignment and, using any instructor input, reaffirm your findings on the firm’s financial situation and performance in relation to the risks and benefits of forming a strategic alliance, profitability ratios, and potential value-enhancing measures.
How would you revise or update your assessment of the organization’s current performance and financial strategies based on your instructor’s feedback and how the financial markets have evolved since you submitted your Financial Analysis assignment?
How would you utilize a decision matrix to assess the risks of your proposed strategic option as well as the financial ramifications of pursuing it for your company?
Is the choice matrix a good tool for risk prediction? Why do you think that is?
What effect does the decision matrix have on the method you previously identified as the most advantageous?
Determine a minimum of 10 distinct risks connected with the strategic choice you believe will give the most substantial opportunity for your organization to add value using a risk matrix. Choose two or three of the most important hazards and analyze how they might affect your chosen solution.
Together with your written response, submit your risk matrix.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
IKEA Risk Assessment And Management |
IKEA Risk Assessment And Management