Illuminating the Druggable Essay Assignment

June 4, 2022

Illuminating the Druggable Essay Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Illuminating the Druggable Essay Assignment

Instructions

Research is expensive, so finding funding sources is a critical piece of the ‘conducting research’ puzzle. Your assignment is to use the Grants.gov website to search for a grant that would fund research in an interest area of your choice. In addition to finding the grant, write up a narrative that provides the following information on the announcement you chose. Your write up must include:

What your interest area is

Funding opportunity number and title

Include URLs for the grants.gov announcement and full award information

Identify the grant making agency (If NIH, also include which institute)

Summarize the purpose of the funding opportunity

Provide the posting date, application due date, review dates, earliest start date for funding if awarded, and announcement expiration date (If ‘standard’ date, determine your dates using the funding agency’s tables for the current cycle)

Provide how much funding is being offered

Provide funding timeline

Provide any named contacts including their title and contact info for the announcement

Why you chose this grant and how it fits with your interest area.

Your grant can come from any grant making agency, but your interest area and purpose of the funding opportunity must be to address a health-related issue. So, grants for improved roadways from the Department of Transportation would not be acceptable, but if the Department of Transportation has a grant for research into reducing drunk driving fatalities, that would be acceptable.

Illuminating the Druggable Essay Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met