The Valuation Principles of The Acquisition Method

June 4, 2022

The Valuation Principles of The Acquisition Method

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

The Valuation Principles of The Acquisition Method

In this discussion, please reflect on the previous weeks’ topics. Choose a topic you found to be difficult or hard to understand. Research this topic and present your findings. Include a summary of the topic, why you found the topic to be difficult, and what you learned after conducting the research. I WILL FIND A TOPIC LATER

Choose one of the following for your main post:

Differentiate between the software concepts of operating systems, application programs, utility programs, and programming languages.

Define the term information systems life cycle and explain its application in project management.

Describe the functionalities of an electronic health record.

W6: Research and Discussion

Research and discuss a disease or disorder (in detail) affecting one or both of the systems (eyes, ears & integumentary system) we are examining this week. Be sure to begin with the name of disease or disorder – break it down into its component parts. Continue with the symptoms. Finally, how is the disease or disorder treated and what is its prognosis? Check before posting to ensure that you are not discussing a disease or disorder that someone has already chosen.

The Valuation Principles of The Acquisition Method

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met