Indian Civil Rights Act and the 1975

June 4, 2022

Indian Civil Rights Act and the 1975

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Indian Civil Rights Act and the 1975

1) What did the 1968 Indian Civil Rights Act and the 1975 Native American Self-Determination and Educational Assistance Acts entail? How do both of these acts build off of and/or differ from the previous Termination and Relocation policies we learned about?

2) What does the term “self-determination” mean? Why might it be an important term to Native American tribes/nations based on the history we’ve learned so far?

3) According to the PowerPoint lecture, our readings and video on AIM, how exactly did the American Indian Movement emerge?

4) What is the historical significance/symbolism of the location in which the Occupation of Alcatraz took place? What were the goals of the Occupation of Alcatraz?

5) What was the “Trail of Broken Treaties”? What happened during the occupation, and what demands were made? How did the occupation conclude?

6) According to the documentary, what historical events led up to the Occupation of Wounded Knee? What is the historical significance/symbolism of the location in which the Occupation of Wounded Knee took place?

7) According to the article, why is Occupy Wounded Knee considered a “forgotten Civil Rights movement”?

8) Lastly, please share your thoughts and reactions to both this weeks and last week’s discussions on the Occupations of Alcatraz and Wounded Knee, and the American Indian Civil Rights movement overall.

I provided the videos and articles you will need to answer these questions. must be 500-550 words in total, so not each question 500 words. No citations, just make sure to go in depth when answering the questions. Lastly, needs to be in numbered form, NOT AN ESSAY.

https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nativevoices/timeline/516….

https://www.nps.gov/alca/learn/historyculture/we-h…

https://www.foundsf.org/index.php?title=ALCATRAZ_P…

https://muscarelle.wm.edu/rising/broken-treaties/

https://sdsu.kanopy.com/product/wounded-knee

https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/…

http://www.nativepartnership.org/site/PageServer?p…

Indian Civil Rights Act and the 1975

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met