Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Infant Gut Associated Bacterium Species Discussion
.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-021-00970-4
Name of journal and date of publication: Bifidobacterium species associated with breastfeeding produce aromatic lactic acids in the infant gut
Nature Microbiology, October 21, 2021
Authors names (first and last authors only):
Martin F. Laursen, Henrik M. Roager
Infant Gut Associated Bacterium Species Discussion
Your group’s summary to why this research article:
In this article, researchers found an enzyme Bifidobacteria use to turn aromatic amino acid from breastmilk into lactic acid derivatives in the infant’s gut. Then, they argue that the lactic acid derivatives play an important role in the infant immune system. They showed how the metabolic pathway of a bacterium in the gut microbiome could enhance the immunity of the host. Thus, this research utilized techniques such as 16s rRNA sequencing and recombinant expressions, which are techniques commonly used in Microbiology. Therefore, we think this article is worthy of being presented in class.
Introduction Section (at least 5 key points)
Results Section (at least 6 key points)
Methods (at least 4 key points)
Discussion/Conclusion (at least 4 key points)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Infant Gut Associated Bacterium Species Discussion