Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Interaction Between Leaders and Their Environments, As Well As Theory Applicability
Leadership theories frequently look at how the leader interacts with the circumstance or setting. You will compare and contrast two leadership theories in terms of how they address the interaction between the leader and the circumstance or context, as well as evaluate the theories’ relevance to a number of scenarios in this assignment.
Requirements in general:
To guarantee that the assignment is completed successfully, use the following information:
A rubric is used in this task. Please study the rubric before beginning the assignment to ensure that you understand the requirements for a successful completion.
At least two additional academic research sources pertaining to this issue must be included in your assignment, with at least one in-text citation from each source.
For their writing tasks, doctoral students must adhere to the APA style. In the Student Success Center, you’ll find the APA Style Guide.
Specific requirements for PhD level writing can be found in Chapters 2-4 of the American Psychological Association’s (6th ed.) Publication Manual. These chapters cover the organization and substance of manuscripts, as well as clean and
succinct writing and academic grammar and terminology.
This assignment must be completed and submitted to LopesWrite. For more information, see the LopesWrite Technical Support articles.
Directions:
Compare and contrast two leadership theories in terms of how they address the relationship between the leader and the circumstance or context, and evaluate the theories’ relevance to a variety of situations in a 1,000-1,250 word paper. In
your paper, include the following:
A quick rundown of each theory. Identify and describe the theory’s primary components.
A clear, research-backed comparison of the two philosophies’ approaches to the interplay between the leader and the situation or context.
An assessment of the theories’ applicability in light of the contrast you’ve described. Is one more relevant to a wide range of scenarios than the other? Why do you think that is?
Interaction Between Leaders and Their Environments
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Interaction Between Leaders and Their Environments |