Interviewing A Psychologist Regarding ASD In Children
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Interviewing A Psychologist Regarding ASD In Children
Interview a school psychologist regarding assessments and assessment criteria that are used to identify autism spectrum disorder. Also inquire about the roles and responsibilities of teachers and school staff related to assessment and diagnosis for an individual suspected of having ASD, including what they do to reduce or eliminate bias in the administration and interpretation of the assessments.
Write a 750-1000-word that addresses the following;
Compare and contrast assessments and assessment criteria used to help identify ASD in children.
Describe the roles and responsibilities of teachers and staff in implementing and interpreting those assessments,
Describe what can be done to reduce or eliminate bias in the administration and interpretation of the assessments.
Cite information gleaned from the interview as well as three scholarly resources to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Materials if you need assistance.
Document the hours and locations that you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.
Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form with the last assignment by the assignment due date. Directions for submitting can be found on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center.
step 22
Upload Files
Start by clicking Upload Files in the table below. Make sure to add all of the files required for your submission.
This assignment requires a Similarity Report.
You can request one within the table after uploading your files. Files submitted to your instructor without a Similarity Report will automatically receive one upon submission.
Note: Once a Similarity Report is created for a file, it cannot be deleted.
step 33
Submit Assignment
Click the checkbox next to any files you would like to submit and click Submit Assignment to send them to your instructor.
Uploaded Files
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results