Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Introduction to the Solar System Post Lab Review
Introduction to the Solar System Post Lab Review
Data Table 1: Planet Distance from the Sun and Orbit Duration
Data Table 2: Dwarf Planet Distance from the Sun and Orbit Duration
Graph 1: Solar System Object Distance vs. Time
*insert Excel graph here, or complete a hand-drawn graph below
Exercise 1 – Questions
1. Identify the terrestrial planets, Jovian planets, and dwarf planets in our solar system. Compare and contrast the difference between terrestrial planets and Jovian planets.
2. You have been processing a database of telescope images from our solar system in hopes of discovering new dwarf planets. One day you compared two telescope images from the same area of space and found a moving object that has not yet been cataloged. From the time taken between the two images and the distance the object has moved, you calculate it has an orbit that lasts approximately 150,000 Earth days. Use Graph 1 to determine how far this object is from the Sun. What two known orbiting bodies does it reside between?
3. List the three defining characteristics of a planet. The presence of an atmosphere is not a requirement for an object to be considered a planet, according to the IAU definition. Use the Internet to cite at least two examples in our solar system that illustrate why the existence/non-existence of an atmosphere does not qualify an object for planetary status.
Introduction to the Solar System Post Lab Review
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Introduction to the Solar System Post Lab Review