Investment Simulation Game Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Investment Simulation Game Study Assignment
The investment simulation game is an individual task and it is compulsory. Students can submit the hardcopy of report.
Activities
Date Buy record with price and number of shares, stock names Sell price record with price, number of shares, Stock name
Volume of trade (number shares trade weekly) Weekly Returns Portfolio
Note (reason for buy and sell) (have you applied margin and short selling ?) W3 W4 Week13 Format of the report:
- Title Page (your name, course name: Stock Simulation game)
- Table of contents
- Executive Summary (brief summary of your activities, strategies, your standing portfolio value (increase / decrease)
- Activities in details account
- Strategies adopted (market order, limit order, short selling, margin trading) and rationale for the choice of assets
- Performance measure on weekly basis:
Measured by the holding period raw return:
Holding period return = The ending price – the beginning price) / the beginning price
- What are the best and the worst performing stocks in your portfolio? (Hint: only two stocks, generating the highest and lowest return while holding, including those you are still holding at the time of writing your report.)
Incorporating the knowledge from this unit, explain what have attributed to the above.
What is the overall gain or loss of the portfolio?
Which individual companies gained value?
Which gained the most?
Which lost the most?
Which weeks had the most gain and the most loss for the stocks and for the for US markets during your trading?
- If any, what is the biggest lesson or mistake you have learnt or made during the investment simulation and why?
You may use references to write the report. You can also use graphical aids to present your reports.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow