Kant’s Categorical Imperative and The Golden Rule
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and The Golden Rule
Question 34
2 out of 2 points
Kant’s categorical imperative and the Golden Rule are examples of which moral philosophy?
Teleology
Deontology
The relativist perspective
Egoism
Utilitarianism
Question 35
0 out of 2 points
A marketing manager who orders that a manufacturing plan be refitted to make it safer for workers, no matter what the cost, may be a(n) _______ because he believes in the rights of all individuals.
egoist
utilitarian
deontologist
relativist
hedonist
Question 36
4 out of 4 points
What is white collar crime and why has it become such a widespread problem?
Question 37
4 out of 4 points
Compare and contrast the two teleological philosophies: egoism and utilitarianism? Include a discussion of the bases that each type uses to evaluate the morality of activities?
Question 38
4 out of 4 points
Explain how the levels of Kohlberg’s model of cognitive moral development may influence a person’s perception and response to an ethical issue
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and The Golden Rule
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow