Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Leadership Position Community Development Response
I’m studying for my Communications class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
Respond to two peers’ initial posts with a critique of how well the problem aligns with the organization’s mission and services and with recommendations, potential refinements, or other complex community problems that this organization would be a designated leader.
Student post down below:(Abena)
In Unit 3, the community problem that has been ongoing and presently been addressed by Prince William County, VA residents is Affordable Housing. According to 2018 Community Needs Assessment Greater Prince William, residents stated that affordable housing is difficult to find for middle income families and almost nonexistent for families living below the federal poverty level. After re-evaluating the community problem, I realized that having affordable housing for the community residents connect to my agency’s mission because services are rendered by my home health care agency when client are in their homes . The agency’s mission is dedicated to providing quality care in each client’s home ensuring comfort, dignity, excellence, justice, compassion and with respect of all our multicultural clients and their families (Bennett Home Care Agency, 2020).
Having a house is a key factor in receiving our services so the quality, location and cost of housing has an influence on a person’s health. If a community resident does not have a house or lives in a poor housing that is located in a bad neighborhood with dangerous environmental exposures it can contribute to poor health. According to Viveiros, J. (2015), unaffordable housing measured as housing costs that exceed 30 percent of households’ income and requires households to cut back on other necessities, which often means going without nutritious food or health care services (p. 2). Having to deal with the pressure of not be able to afford a home or having unstable housing situations negatively impacts mental health for people of all ages.
Being in a leadership position, there has to be some sort of collaboration involved in solving this type of issue. Glasby & Dickinson, (2013), defined collaborative leadership as a concept that describes the process of facilitating and operating in multi-organizational arrangements to solve problems that cannot be solved or easily solved by single organizations (p. 7). The future of home health care industry will be successful if affordable housing sector come together to form a partnership and help the health care division better understand the value of housing sector as supporters in backing the health and wellbeing of low-income individuals of all ages and health needs. Also, affordable housing organizations and the home health care sector has to come together to share information and to stress the importance of housing’s role in the health of individuals, families, and communities; and to learn how they can help Medicaid and Medicare improve the quality of life for low-income individuals and families in Prince William County.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Leadership Position Community Development Response |
Leadership Position Community Development Response