logically structured, convincing, and based on empirical evidence proposal
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
logically structured, convincing, and based on empirical evidence proposal
ECP 3930: Policy Brief Guidelines
Dr. Wright (Spring 2020)1 The Policy Proposal
In drafting your proposal, you should consider the following points:
1. The proposal should be well reasoned, logically structured, convincing, and based on empirical evidence.
2. Clearly describe the issue youre addressing and briefly discuss why its an important policy question.
3. Make sure your policy recommendation and details are clear.
4. In creating your program, you should think deeply about the following questions:
(a) What is the scope of the problem?
(b) Do we need a policy intervention to solve this problem? Why is your program the best solution? How will it solve the problem defined?
(c) What is the proposed intervention?
(d) Who will be eligible for this intervention/program? How many people might be affected/treated by your program.
(e) Are there similar policies/programs anywhere in the country?
(f) What is the expected impact of the program on the participants outcomes?
(g) What does empirical evidence say about similar programs?
(h) How will the program be funded? What will it cost?
(i) What is the cost & benefit of the program? Can you calculate the potential return on investment?
(j) What descriptive data, statistics or graph can I use to convince readers? Getting in touch with local government to ask questions is a great idea and would be looked favorably upon.
5. Pay keen attention to the design details and eligibility criteria. Are there potential for unintended consequences? What provisions are being put in place to minimize these?
6. Look to other programs and previous research on the topic –
Have other cities/counties/states tried this before?
Are there any good evaluations of these programs?
Lean as heavily as you can on others evaluations.
7. Explain why you chose the policy you did –
If your program has no precedent, find research on programs that have similar a eligibility criteria or give similar benefits.
If your program is based on best practices, find what other cities are doing and choose the model that has been most successful, or the model that will likely be most successful if implemented in your context. Keep in mind that a great program in Maine might not be as good of a fit for Atlanta as a really good program that worked in Charlotte.
When weighing the evidence on previous programs, keep in mind that you should rely much more heavily on evidence from rigorous evaluations (RCT, RD, DID, IV) than you should on observational studies.
8. If you are choosing between competing policies, you should think about the following
What are the pros and cons of both sides.
Why do the pros of your choice outweigh the cons of the opposing choice(s)?
Which has the highest net return?1.1 Presentation types
Different types of questions will require different presentations and solutions. For example:
1. Youre asked to make a policy recommendation on a common problem that has been addressed and evaluated in other locations:
You should then look at evaluations of these programs and use these to make a recommendations.
Best practices will be a big part of your evaluation.2. Youre asked to make a policy recommendation on a unique or new problem that has not been addressed and evaluated in other locations:
What does economic thinking suggest we should do? Think about peoples behavioral responses. What goal are you trying to achieve.
Weighing the pros and cons will be a big part of your proposal.
3. Youre asked to choose between two choices:
Think about the cost-benefit analysis. Why might one be better than the other.1.2 Researching your topic
If you have a best practices type topic,
Youll want to look to think tanks and evaluation centers like those listed below for formal evaluations.
You should also look to the cities themselves to see what programs theyve enacted.
If there are more than you can present in your allotted time, just talk about the most relevant ones.
If you have an economic problem to solve, look to more formal research from economic journals (the think tanks will have some research too).
Youll want to look at what conditions might make these programs work.
Think clearly about mechanisms and incentives when you make your recommendation.
If there arent many good program evaluations on the topic, say so, and make your argument based on economic thinking.2 Rules
Policy Brief Formatting:
1. This is due by April 22nd.
2. The policy brief should be 5-10 pages. This does not include the cover page, abstract, table of contents, references, and appendix. It should be written with 1.5 spacing, Times New Roman, & in font size 12.3. All the research you reference should be cited properly and a reference list should be provided in APA format at the end.
Presentation:
1. You have 5 minutes to make your presentation. Your slides should be sent to me prior to class on April 28th. This is the only submission you need to make.Grading:
1. Proposal (22%)
2. Presentation & Critique (8%)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow logically structured, convincing, and based on empirical evidence proposal
logically structured, convincing, and based on empirical evidence proposal