Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
LSP 112 FIFA World Cup Expansion Essay Questions
ISSUES TO DISCUSS IN YOUR FINAL PAPER ESSAY:
1- From what you have learned during class, please select and argue the ideal “RUN-UP” time from selecting a World Cup host until the date that competition would be held. Please make sure to defend that length of time, why such selection you made is vital for FIFA and World Cup success… and examples of the past to support your claims.
2- What should a future World Cup nation host look like? Thus, please address what KINDS of nations should be hosting a tournament. Should they only be first world, economically elite nations… or should we get a cross-section of different kinds of lands and cultures–regardless of financial standing globally? What factors would go into deciding whether a nation is a good and safe choice to present a World Cup, and why? Please don’t forget examples.
3- Joint Hosting: With the World Cup field being expanded in 2026 to FORTY-EIGHT (48) nations, what will the future of staging a World Cup look like? Is co-hosting going to mostly become inevitable–and why or why not? What traits should we look at when examining a co-hosted competition, and which nations should NOT be paired… and why/why not? Or, should we keep the general trend of one nation getting to present the tournament, regardless of teams competing in the event? (Don’t forget examples.)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
LSP 112 FIFA World Cup Expansion Essay Questions |
LSP 112 FIFA World Cup Expansion Essay Questions