Making Difficult Ethical Decisions Assignment Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Making Difficult Ethical Decisions Assignment Essay
Karen is a Latina, lesbian woman who decided to come out to her family and classmates when she started her second year in her psychology doctoral program. She thought that things would be easier now that she could be her “true self” around her family and friends. However, several people were not as accepting of her as she would have liked, including her parents and four siblings. As a result, she struggles to keep up with schoolwork, is tearful during class, and becomes upset while in conferences with professors. The faculty at her school are talking about requiring her to start psychological treatment to deal with these issues, and are even considering removing her from the program.
What does the code say about what suggestions of the faculty? What are the cultural implications of doing what they are suggesting? Apply the ethical decision-making model discussed in Fisher (2013) to this situation and make a decision about how to handle Karen’s situation.
Response Guidelines
Examine the work of at least two other learners and comment on the following elements:
Their perspective on what the ethical code says about the scenario.
Their analysis of the cultural implications of doing what they are suggesting.
Their application of all steps of the ethical decision-making model discussed in Fisher (2013) to this situation.
Their resulting decision on how to handle Karen’s situation.
Your response may include comparing and contrasting several elements of the components or the outcome of your initial post.
Note: Remember, all of your discussion posts are expected to be written at a graduate level, be free from typos and spelling errors, and follow standard English grammar. You will need to support your points with in-text citations and references in APA style. This may include your readings for this course, but also outside scholarly sources that you obtain relevant to this discussion from our library.
The Board Is Exploring The Option Of Creating A Quantitative Decision-Making Support
The Board is exploring the option of creating a Quantitative Decision-Making Support Center in the Medical Center. However, they are not sure if the benefits of the investment in this new Center would justify the additional cost. The Board wants to buy new equipment of an out-patient radiology Center and secondly, they want to expand their home-health physical therapy services.
Your assignment is to write a short report (one page ) to the Board explaining how specific quantitative tools can help the organization make better decisions. Select and discuss 2 specific tools from the following list. Tell the Board what the pros and cons are of using the tools to help support making a decision about the two initiative mentions above. Your choices are;
Net Present Value
Break-Even-Analysis
Decision TreesMaking Difficult Ethical Decisions Assignment Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow