Management and Leadership Discussion Assignment Project Term Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Management and Leadership Discussion Assignment Project Term Paper
Answer the following:
- What is the relationship among corporate, business and functional-level strategies and how do they create value for the organization? Please ensure that after defining, you give specific examples of each. (40 pts) NOTE: Make sure that your example is specific and fully demonstrates that you understand the concept–remember, the reader does not know what you mean, the reader only knows what you’ve written. Do not skimp on this section or much credit will be forfeit. Please do not use the Genera Mills example (or other examples) from this chapter or you will be ineligible for credit. Use your own experience or that from research on an organization.
- What is a learning organization and how can it be beneficial OR not beneficial. Be specific, please.? (15 pts)
- Perform a Self-SWOT analysis (Completed in Table format) (25 pts)
Remember, the self-SWOT can really be a valuable activity for you, but you only get out of it what you put into it.
- Formulate a strategy to use what you outlined in the SWOT for personal growth. (20 pts)
As always, check the rubric by clicking on this at the top right to know the expectations before beginning and to keep you on track as you write. And of course, if you have any questions at all, please post in the Question & Answer Forum or email me if it is something that you do not want publicly shared.
Additionally, EFSC has created a LibGuide (Links to an external site.) specific to the Business Department that you will likely find helpful (including citation information)–I strongly recommend that you click the link below and check it out. Must get An A
Management and Leadership Discussion Assignment Project Term Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Management and Leadership