Manuscript Draft Assignment Help 1 Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Manuscript Draft Assignment Help 1
Sources:1
Subject: Literature
Topic: Manuscript Draft
Paper details:
USE EITHER ARTICLE- DO NOT USE BOTH https://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/ND18p10.shtml https://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/practice/do-we-care-about-the-fate-of-children-in-foster-care/ As explained in the Assignment 3 module, I recommend that you use articles published in The New Social Worker (TNSW) online magazine as models for your research essay.
Although TNSW does not use headings to the degree that Social Work Today (SWT) does, feel free to use them strategically according to APA Style: Here’s an example of a short article with headings written by Dr. Veronica Hardy ????:
https://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/career-jobs/turn-negative-self-talk-into-opportunity-empowerme/ (Links to an external site.) Instructions Informed by peer and instructor comments on Discussions 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 as well as your review of several professional magazine articles, update and expand your manuscript draft in one or more of the following ways over several days–not all at once. ???? Develop vivid details to describe and explain the problem you are writing about and reasons for your claims. Strive for a final draft of 750-1000 words.
This is a bit longer than an NSWT article but shorter than a SWT article. Remember to use direct quotations sparingly (no more than 10-20% of your document) and signal them according to APA style: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/quotations Use these Yale University Writing Center handouts for signal words and transitions to improve the “flow” of your writing:
Stitching Handout (Signal Words and Transitions) Yale UWC.pdf Download Stitching Handout (Signal Words and Transitions) Yale UWC.pdf Putting Sources in Conversation (Verbs and Clauses) Yale UWC.pdf Download Putting Sources in Conversation (Verbs and Clauses) Yale UWC.pdf Use your introduction to describe a “scene” or an “anecdote” (brief story) or “profile” an individual impacted by the problem that is your topic. Follow with a second paragraph in which you state your thesis at the end as a “frame” for your essay.
Note that you might not know what your thesis will be in its final form until you have completed revising to improve and complete your draft. The Scriber videos below offer fairly simple strategies for improving the coherence and vividness of your essay for readers.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results