psychological intimacy essay assignment help
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
psychological intimacy essay assignment help
Topic: psychological intimacy
Paper details:
Erikson taught that psychological intimacy is core to the psychosocial development of young adults. What do you think about this idea, and how does this have relevance in 2021? What has the experience of lockdown been like for you (psychologically, socially, emotionally, relationally, spirituality, etc.). How can you intentionally and deliberately build high quality psychological intimacy as a safeguard against psychological isolation during these trying times.
Prepare an Assignment Addressing the Following Four Questions: 1. Explore the relationship between intimacy and isolation 2. How do the concepts of intimacy and isolation help us understand current social dynamics during the pandemic? 3. How can you link these ideas to your own dynamic experience? 4. How do you build an intentional path towards meaningful, healthy, and growth promoting relationships of intimacy in the future? (How do you apply this wisdom?) Ø Answer the four questions above in a more traditional essay. This is an academic paper.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results