Marketing Management Individual Project Recommendations
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Marketing Management Individual Project Recommendations
MARKETING MANAGEMENT INDIVIDUAL PROJECT (MMIP) RECOMMENDATIONS
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Quotes must be minimized and
long quotes (40 words or more) avoided. Outside sources to be cited include scholarly marketing
journals (Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research,
etc.), practitioner publications, and the course textbook.
The student will submit a 600-word recommendations document (12-point Times
New Roman font, double spaced), based on information gathered over the course of the session while completing the project installments. A minimum of five strategic and five operational recommendations must be offered. The student will add scriptural integration throughout the recommendations, quoting relevant scripture verses as appropriate. There must be a minimum of 10 relevant scriptural quotes found throughout the recommendations document, with their relevance to the recommendations explained. The 600-word requirement does not include the title page, scriptural quotes, or references.
The recommendations document must include a title page, a brief introduction delineating the recommendations, and a separate section (with heading) for each recommendation. At least 5 scholarly resources (in addition to the Bible) must be used. The recommendations document must be submitted
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results