Measuring the Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic among Health Care Workers
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Measuring the Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic among Health Care Workers
Week 03 Assignment – Problem, Aim Statement and Project Objectives
Instructions:
For this assignment, you will use the “Worksheet for Developing Your Quality Improvement Project” (PDF)- ATTACHED) to help you develop the problem, aim statement, and project objectives for your quality improvement project. Use the assignment’s guidelines as listed below to complete this assignment.
Use this TOPIC from a previous assignment: Measuring the Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic among Health Care Workers
Students will create sections on:
Problem Statement
Define the nature and significance of the local problem, and the focus of your proposed QI project.
Describe the local context:
type and size of organization
details about the staff members
brief description of patient population.
Aim Statement
Time-specific and measurable; it should also define the specific population that will be affected (ihi.org, 2017).
Use the S.M.A.R.T. criteria:
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Realistic/Relevant
Timely
Project Objectives
(what do you expect your project to accomplish)Use the S.M.A.R.T. criteria to write each objective.
Reference:
John Hopkins Medical. (n.d.) Worksheet for Developing Your Quality Improvement Project. John Hopkins Medical School.
Nash, D.B., Joshi, M.S., Ransom, E.R., & Ransom, S.B. (Eds.) (2019). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategies, and tools (4th ed.). Health Administration Press.
Nash, Joshi, Ransom, & Ransom: Chapters 4, 9, & 12.
ASQ. (2021). Quality assurance and quality control. ASQ Quality Press.
IHI. (2021). Measures. IHI Open School.
IHI. (2021). Science of Improvement: Establishing Measures. IHI Open School.
Nelson, E.C., Mohr, J.J., Batalden, P.B., & Plume, S.K. (1996). Improving health care, part 1: The clinical value compass (PDF). Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 22(4), 243-258.
Writing Guide for the entire MSN program:
APA. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Content in weeks Lesson
IHI. (n.d.). Science of Improvement: Establishing Measures. IHI Open School. (Video)
N.A. (n.d.). Worksheet for Developing your Quality Improvement Project. Johns Hopkins Medicine.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow