Mini-Write Up Academic Discipline Report
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Mini-Write Up Academic Discipline Report
Submit your Mini-Write Up paper for this discipline (Word or PDF). For each of the disciplines, you will write a brief summary of the main concepts, competencies, and assumptions associated with that discipline. You can choose one specific sub-discipline (such as Psychology) from the different disciplines that we have studied in this module to focus your response – make sure to clearly state the name of the discipline that you are writing about.
You will also reflect and write about your belief (from your “This I Believe” Introduction) from the viewpoint of the discipline. For example, you might consider the degree to which the concepts of this discipline match your own thinking. Are the concepts drastically different from your thoughts, and if so, how is it different?
Does what you have learned about this discipline challenge or affirm your belief in any way? You should also think critically about any assumptions, errors, or bias that might relate to this discipline. Plan to use instructor feedback on this assignment in writing your final “This I Believe” paper.
Required Elements:
Describe the essential concepts (understandings) and competencies (skills) relevant to the specific academic discipline in at least 4-6 sentences.
Answer the following questions in at least 4-6 sentences:
How would a scholar from this discipline view your Belief? What stance might they take? Why?
Does the viewpoint from this discipline align or contradict with your viewpoint(s)? Why or why not?
What, if any, assumptions and biases can you identify within this discipline? In what ways has this discipline made you think about the potential for biases in your own assumptions or ideology
Mini-Write Up Academic Discipline Report
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow