Multiplication Table for Values Ranging
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Multiplication Table for Values Ranging
In this homework, you will design a program to perform the following task: Write a program that would calculate and display the results for the multiplication table for values ranging from 1 to 100.
Before attempting this exercise, be sure you have completed all of chapter 4 ,5 and course module readings, participated in the weekly conferences, and thoroughly understand the examples throughout the chapter. There are 3 main components of your submission including the problem analysis, program design and documentation, and sample test data.
1. Provide your analysis for the following problem statement: You need to write a program that would calculate the results for the multiplication table up from 1 to 100. (For example, 1X1, 1X2, 1X3 … 1X10, 2X1, 2X2 …. 10X2 … 10×10). Your program should print the output for each step and output a new line after 10 items. So the example output would be something like this Notice a new line appears after 10 steps:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 4 6 8 10 … 20
…
10 20 30 … 100
To write the new lines you can just use code similar to : write “new line”. Hint: You will probably use a nested repetition loop.
Your analysis should be clearly written and demonstrate your thought process and steps used to analyze the problem. Be sure to include what is the required output? What is the necessary input and how you will obtain the required output from the given input? Also, include your variable names and definitions. Be sure to describe any necessary formulas and sample calculations.
1. Provide your program design for the program you analyzed for printing the multiplication table. Be sure to describe the fundamental tasks (i.e., things your program must do) needed to solve the problem so you can use a modular design. Provide pseudocode of your overall design that includes the Main module and the order of the module calls, and a Hierarchy chart for the program (see figure 3.8 page 148). Finally, display the flow charts (using Raptor, or your favorite graphics editor) for each module. (See figure 5.3 page 225 as an example.)
FIGURE 3.8 PAGE 148 SCREENSHOT
FIGURE 5.3 PAGE 225 SCREENSHOT
Include header and step comments in your pseudocode, using a similar approach as the example provided in section 2.3 (textbook page 86). See example 2.8 on pages 87-88).
SECTION 2.3 SCREENSHOTS
1. Prepare any input data (Test data) along with expected output for testing your program (Note: Programs may not always have both input and output data. Just provide test cases for your application).
Rubric Name: Assignment Rubric
Criteria Exceeds Meets Does not meet Design 20 points (18-20 points)
Employs Modularity (including proper use of parameters, use of local variables etc.) most of the time
Employs correct & appropriate use of programming structures (loops, conditionals, classes etc.) most of the time
Efficient algorithms used most of the time
17 points (15-17 points)
Employs Modularity (including proper use of parameters, use of local variables etc.) some of the time
Employs correct & appropriate use of programming structures (loops, conditionals, classes etc.) some of the time
Efficient algorithms used some of the time
14 points (0-14 points)
Rarely employs Modularity (including proper use of parameters, use of local variables etc.)
Rarely employs correct & appropriate use of programming structures (loops, conditionals, classes etc.)
Poorly structured and inefficient algorithms
Functionality 40 points (36-40 points)
Program fulfills all functionality
All requirements were fulfilled
Extra effort was apparent
35 points (29-35 points)
Program fulfills most functionality
Most requirements were fulfilled
28 points (0-28 points)
Program does not fulfill functionality
Few requirements were fulfilled
Test 20 points (18-20 points)
Comprehensive test plan
17 points (15-17 points)
Good test plan included
14 points (0-14 points)
No test plan included
Documentation 20 points (18-20 points)
Excellent comments
Comprehensive lessons learned
Excellent possible improvements included
Excellent approach discussion and references
17 points (15-17 points)
Good comments
Some lessons learned
Some possible improvements included
Some approach discussion
14 points (0-14 points)
No comments
No lessons learned
No possible improvements
No approach discussion
Overall Score Exceed 90 or more Meets 70 or more Does not meet 0 or more Bottom of Form
Multiplication Table for Values Ranging
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow