Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Negotiations and Decision-Making Skills Discussion
Written report will test key content areas of the course including negotiations and the decision making that underlies it.
Task is to either reflect on your negotiation and decision-making skills including how you will use “nudges” or “bias busters” to improve yourself, or to use your learnings from the course to improve others’ negotiations and decision making including non-profit organizations, government or business.
2-3 pages total
1000 Word limit excluding references
Marking Criteria:
Negotiations and Decision-Making Skills Discussion
Academic Research & Business Knowledge (20%)
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving (20%)
Negotiations and Decision-Making Skills Discussion
Structure & Logic (20%)
Novelty & Originality (20%)
Impact & Professionalism (20%)
Central Texas College Persuasive Speaking Discussion
I’m working on a communications discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
In the Activity titled “Persuasive Speaking,” examine Figure 3.1. Imagine a scenario (different than the one given in the reading) where you try to convince a group of people to do something. Apply the different latitudes in Figure 3.1. to the reactions people might have to your talk. Why would they have these reactions? Explain in your own words what this has to do with persuasion.
Negotiations and Decision-Making Skills Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Negotiations and Decision-Making Skills Discussion