Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Forms of Digital Visual Communication Analytical Review
Analyse three different forms of visual digital communication used for disseminating organisational, educational or research content, and evaluate three contrasting methods for gauging the audience response. Relate your analysis to the context, aims and needs of the relevant organisation(s) and support your discussion with references to existing literature, key theories and published research
Communication Ethics US Copyright Law Memorandum
Introduction
Continue your critical examination of the one or more moral problems in your organization. Incorporate feedback from your instructor while also writing a new section. Use not an academic but a business style.
Directions
Below is detail about this stage.
Revise the date of your memo and expand its body and references.
Limit this stage of your memo to a 2 pages with 1-inch margins, 12-point serif font, and double-spacing.
Incorporate your instructor’s feedback on the previous stages of your memo.
Continue to write the body of your memo by inserting the section title “The Causes.”
Use the present tense for this section.
Forms of Digital Visual Communication Analytical Review
Then use prose to answer the questions below. Do not merely restate the questions and provide their answers. Instead, ensure that the body has a narrative flow.
How are factors internal to the organization contributing to the one or more problems? If you identify more than 5 factors, discuss the 5 most important factors only. Provide enough of an explanation to imply one or more solutions to the problem (without naming the solutions).
How are factors external to the organization contributing to the one or more problems? If you identify more than 5 factors, discuss the 5 most important factors only. Provide enough of an explanation to imply one or more solutions to the problem (without naming the solutions).
Throughout this section, provide sufficient support for your statements with (a) facts and (b) values from organizational overviews (e.g., an “About Us” page on a website) or codes of conduct (e.g., “Code of Ethics,” “Principles of Professional Practice,” or “Responsible Code of Conduct”) and professional codes of conduct.
When drawing from sources, provide citations in the body and a “References” appendix in accordance with APA.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Forms of Digital Visual Communication Analytical Review