Non-Verbal Communication Discussion Case Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Non-Verbal Communication Discussion Case Assignment
Part 1: Non-verbal communication – discuss what you found to be the most interesting aspects of non-verbal communication we discussed. What did you learn? Will you view your own non-verbals differently in the future?
Part 2: How has Covid19, and wearing a mask, impacted your ability to interpret the non-verbal communications of others? For instance, I was at Home Depot returning an item from a home project I’m working on. I smiled at the sales associate, but her “tone” wasn’t as friendly as I was expecting. I thought to myself… HOW RUDE… but then realized, she couldn’t actually see me smile – therefore my smiling did nothing to demonstrate friendliness. It was a powerful reminder of how we utilize non-verbals in our interactions with others. Have you had a similar experience?
CA 103 Addressing Climate Change Parts of The World Discussion
Speech Topic Selection and Audience Analysis
for Speech 4: Persuasive Policy Speech (Motivated Sequence)
Purpose:
This discussion will allow you to present the topic for your next speech, get feedback from your audience (your classmates), and conduct an analysis of your audience.
After reading Chapter 5 in your textbook, “Audience Analysis,” you should have some idea of the kinds of information you need to know in order to refine your topic for your audience.
Non-Verbal Communication Discussion Case Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow