Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
North Korea Nuclear Program Discussion
Option 2:
A number of people have argued that the 2nd Gulf war was the result of a commitment problem, possibly on both sides. Lay out all the reasons you can think of why Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush may not have been able to reach an agreement short of war, and then offer at least one criticism about why this explanation may not be sufficient to explain why war broke out. If a lack of credible commitments is unable to fully explain why war broke out in 2003, why do you think the war happened?
Option 3 (answer all of the following):
Option 4 (answer all of the following):
President Trump has vowed to put an end to North Korea’s nuclear program. What strategies does he have at his disposal to achieve this objective? What strategy has he chosen to pursue and why do you think he has chosen this strategy versus other potential strategies?
How likely do you believe this strategy is to work (i.e., convince Kim Jong Un to end North Korea’s nuclear program?) If you think it is likely to work, please explain how. If you think it is likely to fail, please explain why Trump has chosen such a strategy.
Choose one of these options. 2 to 3 pages(no longer than 3 pages) 12 double-spaced. Need to identify 1 or 2 main motivations for an action and evaluate the success of a strategy in terms of the goal you identified.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
North Korea Nuclear Program Discussion |
North Korea Nuclear Program Discussion