Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Take a look at the following two videos:
After you’ve finished watching the videos, make a blog entry answering the following questions:
1. How do you believe Californians will cope with the severe shortages? Be as precise as possible.
2. With less surface water for agriculture, drinking water, and natural ecosystems, people will begin to rely more heavily on deep wells to get water from underground aquifers. Groundwater shortages in California may occur swiftly due to the state’s rapidly rising population. In the next ten years, the population of Southwest Florida is expected to skyrocket. Is it possible that we may face similar water shortages in the future? Why do you think that is?
3. Make a case that one of the following is directly related to access to water:
A. inequity in the economy, or
B. a tense situation
4. Do you think raising the price of water is a good idea?
5. Can humans survive without water for an extended period of time?
6. Do you believe something similar to what occurred in Cape Town, South Africa, might occur in the United States?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Ocean Resources, Fresh Water, and the Global Water Crisis, A Video Analysis Discussion |
Ocean Resources, Fresh Water, and the Global Water Crisis, A Video Analysis Discussion