Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Optimal Outcome Discussion, Reflect on Yourself and Your Partner
Include an in-text citation from your textbook that supports your answer in at least one of your replies. Remember that there are no “correct” answers, so consider your options carefully.
Step 1: Think about yourself.
In this situation, what are your thoughts and feelings? What conclusions do you draw about Dylan and his actions? Are your attributions correct, or are they skewed by your personal feelings towards him?
Answer:
Step 2: Consider your mate.
Put yourself in Dylan’s shoes by using perspective-taking and empathic care. In this moment, what is he thinking and feeling?
Answer:
Step 3: Determine the best outcome.
Consider your interactions with Dylan and your connection with him, as well as the circumstances around the group project (including your leadership responsibilities). What is the most positive and productive relationship outcome? Think about what’s best for you and Dylan.
Answer:
Step 4: Identify the stumbling blocks.
What hurdles are blocking you from attaining the best solution, taking into account your own and Dylan’s views and feelings, as well as all that has happened in this situation?
Answer:
Step 5: Make a plan for your journey.
What can you say to Dylan to help him overcome the obstacles you’ve identified and reach your goal?
Answer:
The length of each step’s explanation and answer is 150 words.
Optimal Outcome Discussion, Reflect on Yourself and Your Partner
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Optimal Outcome Discussion, Reflect on Yourself and Your Partner |
Optimal Outcome Discussion, Reflect on Yourself and Your Partner