Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Organizational Performance & Critical Decision-Making
View the Allied Health Community media scenario titled “Critical Decision Making for Providers.”
Examine the scenario with Mike, the lab worker, in a 1,000-1,250-word paper and discuss the following:
Discuss the ramifications of failing to report.
Explain how his decision affected patient safety and organizational performance (litigation risk, quality measures, workload of other hospital departments, and so on).
As Mike’s boss, explain how you would handle the situation with him and what efforts you would take to guarantee that other employees do not make the same mistake.
Consider the event and consider what underlying factors or difficulties may be at play in situations like this.
Take a look at how most health-care organizations operate (structure, people, technology, environment). Discuss how organizational behavior and development ideas can be implemented to effectively contribute to the success of a health-care
company as a leader. What is the best way to apply these concepts to this situation?
This assignment requires a minimum of three academic references from reliable sources.
Prepare this work in accordance with the APA Style Guide, which may be found in the Student Success Center. It is not necessary to submit an abstract.
A rubric is used in this task. Please study the rubric before beginning the assignment to ensure that you understand the requirements for a successful completion.
Organizational Performance and Critical Decision-Making
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Organizational Performance and Critical Decision-Making |
Organizational Performance and Critical Decision-Making