overview of Ewing sarcoma assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
overview of Ewing sarcoma assignment
Sources:3
Subject: Biology
Topic: Ewing Sarcoma
Paper details:
Part 1: Give an overview of Ewing sarcoma. Include what type of cancer it is, how fast it acts, types of mutations in DNA that cause it, is it mostly by chance or are there environmental factors involved, who is at the highest risk for this type of cancer and what are the treatments. Make sure you include the sources you used for this section. (This section will likely be equivalent to 1-2 pages) Part 2: Summarize the science presented in the scientific article as it applies to the scientific method.
You are then tasked with summarizing the research article by identifying the following information as it relates to the scientific method: What was the overall scientific question and hypothesis the article was discussing? What experiments did the research do to test the question and hypothesis? What data did they collect? What were the results? What conclusions did they draw from the data? Did it support the hypothesis or answer the question? Importance: why does this research matter? Part 3: Evaluating the credibility/reliability of the information presented in the scientific article Not all science is created equal! How do you distinguish “good” science from “bad” science? Evaluate your research article for how trustworthy and reliable the information you got from the article is.
Some things to consider: Who is/are the authors? Are they scientists, journalists, bloggers? Are the author’s credentials trustworthy? How recently was the paper published? How might that make a paper more or less reliable? What journal was the paper published in? Is it peer reviewed? Any signs of “bad science”? Part 4: Discussion of how the article relates to concepts learned in class related to Unit 2 (the PDF 6.3 cancer and cell cycle is for this part) The last part of your project is your opportunity to relate what you read about in your article to what we learned in class. You will need to demonstrate what you learned in this unit related to Unit 2 (Cellular Replication and Cancer) and how it supports your understanding of the scientific article you read (you can also include information about Unit 1 as appropriate).
You will also need to discuss how the article has deepened your understanding of the concepts beyond what we covered in class (what did the article teach you that you didn’t learn from class?) part 1 should compose of 1-1.5 pages of text. part 2 should compose of approximately 1-2 paragraphs of text. part 3 should compose of approximately 0.5-1 page of text. Grading Rubric/Checklist: Part 1: 60 pts total Student found an appropriate scientific article (published within 10 years, appropriate subject related to Cell Theory, adequate length/depth) (8 pts)
Student correctly referenced the article and attached the article to the assignment (for instructor review) (4 pt.) Student identified the question/hypothesis from the article (8 pts) Student identified the experiments and summarized the results of the experiments (16 pts) Student summarized the conclusion of the experiments as it relates to the question/hypothesis (12 pts) Student discusses the importance of the research in the broader scientific sense (12 pts) Part 2: 20 pts total
Student discusses reliability and validity of the article in at least three different aspects (author, journal published, type of data collected, etc.) Part 3: 20 pts total Student discusses concepts in class and how they helped them understand the scientific article they wrote about (10 pts) Student discusses concepts in the article and how they helped them more deeply understand concepts discussed that goes beyond what we learned in class (10 pts)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results