PAD 501 Grant Development Research Essay
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
The waiting process once a grant application has been submitted can be grueling. However, this time can be used wisely, and can ensure that an organization is prepared once they are notified of whether they were funded. One essential task is to hold a meeting to debrief with the grant writing staff to assess the effectiveness of the process.
Imagine you are preparing for a debrief meeting, specifically discussing what you have learned from developing this grant for the Resource Center to start an after-school program.
Come up with 23 major takeaways from this process to share with your team. This may be something you learned about the process, a resource or experience you found especially valuable, a challenge you faced, or something that really surprised you.
For the discussion, share your takeaways and be sure to be specific and provide an explanation for each. Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow PAD 501 Grant Development Research Essay
PAD 501 Grant Development Research Essay