Palm Harbor Defamation Case Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Palm Harbor Defamation Case Assignment
I’m working on a business law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
During the time when Judge Barnes is presiding over a trial, she steps into an elevator with her Judicial Assistant while she is on a break. In the elevator, the judge says “Cartwright, the defendant in this defamation case, was a liar when he said that he didn’t shoplift the stereo.” Cartwright overhears the Judicial Assistant telling Farley, a paralegal student from Broward College about the comment. Could Cartwright successfully sue Judge Barnes for libel or for slander, or nothing at all since Cartwright does not have a case? EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER.
Every time Judge Barnes is taking a break from a trial, she takes her Judicial Assistant up on the elevator with her. Cartwright was a liar when he swore he didn’t shoplift the stereo. That’s what the judge said in the elevator. Cartwright hears the Judicial Assistant inform Farley, a Broward College paralegal student, about the remark. Considering that Cartwright has no case, might he sue Judge Barnes for defamation of character or slander? Explain your answer.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow