Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1. Stuart Hall proposes a communication model in “Encoding and Decoding” that depicts audience members as active participants in the reception process of interpreting media messages. What are the three ways that media messages can be decoded and responded to by audience members?
2. How would you characterize the Laotian refugees’ responses to various forms of American media from the Conquergood reading using these decoding positions? Mark Dery defines “culture jamming” as a practice of interpretation that introduces “noise into the signal as it passes from transmitter to receiver, encouraging idiosyncratic, unintended interpretations” in his book “Culture Jamming: Hacking, Slashing, and Sniping in the Empire of Signs” (47). What is the relationship between culture jamming and Hall’s concept of decoding, and how does it differ?
3. Using both the screening and the Lessig reading, provide an example of how copyright litigation affects different types of reception activity (e.g. digital sampling).
Simply read chapters 1, 2, and 3 of this book for the material Remix by Lessig.
Here’s a resource you should read, but I can’t put it on Studypool because it’s too large: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17h0xPfLOxk7EpnW6D … Just read Chapter 1 (pp. 3961) of this book.
1st of 5 slides
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Paper on Encoding and Decoding Media Messages |
Paper on Encoding and Decoding Media Messages