Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
COMMODITY ON A GLOBAL SCALE NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES AND CHAINS
The global network of social contacts and labor activities that go into the production, distribution, consumption, and disposal of a commodity (as defined in Appadurai, p. 3)
Labor, capitalists, nation-states, and consumers are social relations, as are society and nature.
Product design and funding; raw material capture, extraction, and cultivation; processing; transportation; distribution/sale; purchase/consumption; and disposal
Impacts include socioeconomic, political, and environmental factors.
Questions
Capitalist culture/global commodities chains
The Paradox of Karl Polanyi (as defined in GPCC)
Externalities have a negative impact
Negative externalities are internalized
For example, the coffee commodity chain (John Talbot) is the linked series of actions involved in cultivating coffee, processing it, transporting it, roasting it,… selling it to consumers and disposing of it.
Coffee as an example of a video https://u.osu.edu/commoditychain2015/ (This is a link to another website.)
ASSIGNMENT
Choose a single product or a component of a commodity chain (for example, labor and/or ownership/control conditions; social, economic, environmental, and/or health implications; political violence/wars; and so on).
Emphasize labor, capitalists, nation-states, consumers, and the natural environment’s relationships and activities.
Capitalism’s global culture
Commodity chains around the world
Externalities have a negative impact
The paradox of Karl Polanyi (as defined in the GPCC; not Michael Polanyi’s paradox)
Internalizing externalities (more or less = “sustainable”) presents challenges.
1000 words or more of narrative text (no maximum word count); college writing requirements; FIU sanctions enforced
In-text citations; references section; Chicago, MLA, or APA format. Double-spaced 11 or 12-point Times New Roman font; in-text citations; references section; Chicago, MLA, or APA format.
By the day and hour specified on the syllabus, due via.com on Canvas. Late papers will not be accepted (a.com score of 25% or higher indicates a.)
If you want to concentrate on Covid-19 (or any other signature disease), follow these steps:
Covid-19
Describe and explain the major relationships that exist within the global culture of capitalism, including global commodity chains, in a few sentences.
What do you mean when you say “negative externalities”?
What exactly is “Karl Polanyi’s Paradox” (as defined by the GPCC, not Michael Polanyi’s Paradox)?
What are the fundamental questions to ask concerning illness patterns at any given period and place?
What constitutes a signature disease for a certain historical period and geographic linkage pattern?
Describe the relationship between (1) culture and disease; (2) cities and disease; (3) environmental change and disease; and (4) human ecology and disease as a likely cause and spread of Covid-19.
What makes Covid-19 a “signature disease” in this context? And how does it relate to Karl Polanyi’s paradox and negative externalities?
What are the arguments for healthcare as a worldwide public good (and a human right) against healthcare as a commodified individual choice?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|