Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Patients’ Health People’s Health 2030
People in good health in 2030
Overview
The module objective “Demonstrate community assessments and apply epidemiological principles” is connected with this assignment. You will perform the following tasks as part of the written assignment:
Choose one health issue that you believe is the most widespread in your neighborhood. Consult your local health department or a community health nurse for more information. Consider looking into the health-related morbidity and mortality statistics in your area. School nurses are a fantastic source of information. You can make advantage of Franklin County is in the state of Ohio.
Using Milio’s framework for prevention from the module 1 readings, analyze the situation (Chapter three in your text, pp 121- 125).
Choose one of your nursing diagnoses and explain how it relates to the community health problem you discovered. (Please contact me if you require a nursing diagnosis.)
Describe the national goal for people’s health in 2030 that is most relevant to your chosen Diagnosis.
Develop one long-term goal, at least three short-term goals, and interventions for the diagnosis you’ve chosen (you will be developing a teaching plan in week 3).
Goals: A goal is what you want to attain after you’ve completed the interventions. The nature of goals is broad. Consider setting a one-year long-term objective and a six-month short-term goal. These are community objectives that will take longer to achieve. As suggested by the 2030 Healthy People website, consider reducing statistics as a long-term objective. Include timeframes that are specific and measurable. (See page 89 for examples.)
The following are some suggested headings:
Page 1 of 2
7 points Introduction (no heading neededmake sure you addressed the paper’s topic with a purpose statement)
Information (a total of 20 points and please use the following headings)
……………….
Using Milo’s Framework of Prevention to Analyze the Problem/Diagnosis – 6 points
. Compare the problem/diagnosis to the 2030 National Goals for Healthy People – 6 points
. Goals for the Long and Short Term 8 points (2 points for each of the three short-term goals with interventions and 2 points for the long-term goal)
Conclusion (again, no heading is necessary; use in conclusion or summary at the start of the paragraph) 7 points
6 total points for stylistics – APA formatting with suitable word count. Correct citations with four references: two from compulsory course content and two from peer-reviewed sources. Additional criteria can be found on the rubric and beneath it.
References
A total of four (4) references are required: two (2) from mandatory course materials and two (2) from peer-reviewed sources. All of your references must be less than five years old (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)
Peer-reviewed references include evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as well as references from professional data sources such as PubMed or CINHAL that are relevant to the demographic and practice area. Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital groups, insurance advice, and secondary clinical databases are examples of unsuitable references.
Patients’ Health People’s Health 2030
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Patients’ Health People’s Health 2030 |
Patients’ Health People’s Health 2030