Persuasive Communication in A Professional Context Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Persuasive Communication in A Professional Context Assignment
In this assignment, you will write three paragraphs describing and analyzing effective persuasive communication you have encountered or produced in personal, professional, and academic contexts. In each of the three paragraphs, include at least one concrete example of effective persuasion that you have experienced or produced yourself to illustrate your points. Describe that example, identify the parts of the rhetorical situation (audience, speaker, text, purpose, and context), and offer specific reasons why the example was effectively based on the concepts covered in the Units 1 and 2 Reading. You can also include information on tone, style, formality, voice, correctness, evidence, and word choice as you develop your analysis.
Follow APA formatting guidelines for the document. Paragraphs should be well-developed (use the “point, illustrate, explain” method), cohesive, and edited for clarity and correctness. Cite any sources used in APA style, including the course reading.
Use the following chart to help ensure that you meet the following expectations in the final version of your Unit 2 Assignment:
Paragraph 1 · Describe an example of persuasive communication in a personal context. This could be a social media post, an email to a friend, or even a conversation. · Identify the parts of the rhetorical situation.
· Analyze what makes this example effective.
· Draw connections to concepts from the Unit 1 and 2 Reading.
Paragraph 2 · Describe an example of persuasive communication in a professional context. This could be a memo, email, or presentation. · Identify the parts of the rhetorical situation.
· Analyze what makes this example effective and consider the expectations for professional communication in your field.
· Draw connections to concepts from the Unit 1 and 2 Reading.
Paragraph 3 · Describe an example of persuasive communication in an academic context. This could be an essay you wrote for a class, an article you read, or a discussion post. · Identify the parts of the rhetorical situation.
· Analyze what makes this example effective and consider how academic persuasion differs from other contexts.
· Draw connections to concepts from the Unit 1 and 2 Reading.
References · Since you will reference concepts from the Units 1 and 2 Reading or may draw ideas from the PG Writing Center, include signal phrases and citations, like this: According to the PG Writing Center, persuasive writing should. . . · Include a references page with citations for the reading and any other sources you use.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results