Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
PHE4055 Planning and Evaluation of Public Health
Discussion in Week 4
Discussion Task: Respond to this topic. The deadline is June 24 at 11:59 p.m. Assignment: Discussion
The discussion assignment provides a venue for students to explore pertinent subjects for this week based on the course skills addressed.
Make sure you submit your initial comment to the Discussion Area by the due date for this assignment.
Use your course and text readings, as well as additional sources, to support your work. Cite your sources in your work, as in other assignments, and include references for the citations in APA format.
As early as possible in the week, begin examining and commenting to your classmates’ postings. At least two of your peers should receive a response. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, clarifying something, expressing a point of view with a rationale, disputing a point of contention, or pointing out a relationship between two or more lines of argument. By the end of the week, you must have completed your participation for this task.
Health-Program Economic Evaluations
A basic understanding of economic evaluation is required for program planners and evaluators. Furthermore, they may be confronted with ethical dilemmas. Interview healthcare professionals and evaluators in your area. Respond to the following questions based on your interactions:
Examine and choose two different sorts of economic analyses. Compare and contrast the two assessments in terms of the elements that may influence the decision to undertake each of the economic assessments.
Identify at least two potential ethical and social difficulties that may arise during the implementation of the program.
Describe the approach(es) you’d take to deal with these ethical concerns.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
PHE4055 Planning and Evaluation of Public Health |
PHE4055 Planning and Evaluation of Public Health