Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Policy Making Public Policy Essay
1.The course research paper will be one of the opportunities to demonstrate your ability to apply the theories, concepts, models of policy making process, and analysis approaches you have learned and gain throughout the course learning activities. write 2 pages and please provide reference.
Review all readings materials covered in last 7 weeks. Particularly review the process of policy making elements: for your research paper.
Policy Issue Emergency
Agenda Setting
Policy formulation
Alternative Selection
Policy Design
Policy adoption/Enactment
Policy Implementation
Policy Evaluation
2. In every election, especially in California, there are many propositions that ask voters to approve. Sometimes there are propositions that aim to re-visit issues or initiatives that were passed in previous election with anew proposals, such as the plastic bag ban policy. Do you think the process of initiative and referendum are the best practice for policy making? What is the pros and cons for this process? write one page please provide reference.
Policy Making Public Policy Essay
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Policy Making Public Policy Essay