presentation evaluation essay assignment help
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Write 1 single spaced page per presentation evaluation. Your audience is the person/ team presenting; not the professor, so direct your evaluation to them. Each criterion is worth 30 points, with a combined total of 150. The second part is to evaluate and overview of the strengths and areas to improve.
Dont forget to give points and add up the total. Please avoid tiny, incomplete evaluations! Try to be as thorough and honest as possible, while still being professional and appropriate. Remember that your evaluation will help the group or person prepare for future presentations, and it may be reflected in my evaluation and grading of the group also.
You are doing a detailed evaluation, so must know the “text” that they are working with. The video they are using is linked if you click the video title next to their name.
Presentation Grading Criteria Information
*Please include all of the following information in your completed evaluation:
Your Name:
Group or Person Being Evaluated:
PART 1: Major Criteria (make sure to include commentary on each of the below)
1. Knowledge of the video: 30 points possible/____ points earned
Strong knowledge of the video information
Details and essential information are reviewed for the audience (video, director, artist)
Presentation makes the issue clear and a focus is presented
2. Claim made about the video and theory (thesis!) : 30 points possible/____ points earned
Strong argument is made about the video that answers the prompt
Team does NOT just give a summary or movie review, but makes an argument
At least one of our course theorists is used to support this claim
Issues that advance Pop Culture are discussed
Argument is made as to why this video is pivotal to pop culture in 2019
3. Presentation visual: 30 points possible/____ points earned
Organized slides that follow a logical order;
Slides are easy to read and very well-edited;
Slides are clear and uncluttered by distracting text or graphics;
Text shown is brief without huge chunks of excessive text;
Effective use of font type/size, color, background, white space and visual elements;
Visuals or videos incorporated are on-topic, related, and make sense for the topic.
4. Presentation skills: 30 points possible/____ points earned
Speaking clearly and slowly, in a natural but professional manner;
Controlled nervousness (minimal distracting movements or sounds/um, uh, etc.);
Effective use of transitions between speakers or topics;
Group/ Person seems prepared and practiced, regardless of how many you see/hear;
If on-camera: speakers make eye contact with audience/camera and are dressed appropriately (business attire is not required for this
assignment, but it should not be too casual).
5. Time Management: 30 points possible/____ points earned
Presentation is 8 minutes long (8-9min range allowed)
Total Points Earned (out of 150):
Part 2: General Feedback
Please provide a short section that talks about both the strengths and areas to improve that you observed in the presentation.
1. Strengths
2. Areas to Improve
1. Justin Bieber ft Chance the Rapper “Holy by Ariejoyce Carianga- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVko3V3hdY&feature=youtu.be
2. R-Mean and Sebu “We are still here” by Levon Satamian- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBwblTLlNE4&feature=youtu.be
presentation evaluation essay assignment help
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
presentation evaluation essay assignment help