Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1. What did thinking about the essentials and possibles do for your understanding of writing for a specific task/purpose? Will this information transfer to other writing situations? In what ways can you see yourself using this concept in the future?
2. Describe your process in composing and revising your list essay, from essentials/possibles and close reading/analysis of mentor texts/models to drafting and revision. How was your process on this assignment similar to and/or different from your process for other/previous writing assignments? Do you see your processes changing over time? What is causing the change or lack of change?
3. Do you use the feedback you receive on other projects to grow as you work on new projects? How?
4. What did you learn during this project about your writing? What did you learn about yourself? What worked well (and not so well) for you? Do you see yourself growing in your writing, reading, thinking, and communicating? How? In what ways?
5. What are you most proud of about this paper? Can you point to a specific sentence or passage in your essay? Or was there a particular moment or breakthrough during your writing process that stands out? If so, what do you think helped that to occur?
6. What aspects of your final draft are you concerned about? What type of feedback from me would be most helpful? What, from me, would help more during your writing process?
7. On our syllabus, there is a list of student learning outcomes, or goals, for the course. This project was designed to address several of those outcomes. Youve responded to these questions before, but I want to see where your thinking is now after youve done three projects.
See that writing is a form of social interaction. (Note: we did not use a discussion board to revise; how would this project been seen as a form of social interactionthink audience)
Use writing to critically explore, explain, evaluate, and reflect on your experiences and on those of others.
Examine the rhetoric, discourse, and modes of communication in the professional sphere.
8. Any additional comments or questions?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Process in Composing and Revising Your List Essay |
Process in Composing and Revising Your List Essay