Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Profanity and Communication Paper Assignment
Profanity and Communication
APPROPRIATE LANGUAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE PROFANITY OR VULGAR EXPRESSIONS (ESPECIALLY IN PUBLIC SPEAKING OR IN THE WORKPLACE – SEE CHAPTER 6)
Over the years it has become more common due to the influence of TV, film, and music (media who aim to shock and entertain).
Competent communicators avoid using profanity because it is more likely to damage relationships rather than strengthen them.
Profanity and Communication Paper Assignment
Some Reasons Why People Use Profanity
Assert independence
Hard habit to break
Filler expressions
Communicate strong emotions
To shock and intimidate
TO COMMUNICATE DISGUST OR CONTEMPT
Profanity and Eavesdropping Assignment
DIRECTIONS:
STUDENTS ARE TO:
5.DID IT HAVE AN EFFECT ON THE COMMUNICATION OR MESSAGE BEING SENT?
8. In your opinion, what does the use of profane language say about the person using it? How do you view them? In your opinion, are people who use profanity stereotyped? If so, how?
Profanity and Communication Paper Assignment
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Profanity and Communication Paper Assignment