Program Evaluation Assessment Benchmark Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
For this assignment, you will define evaluation research, including a discussion of the purpose and strategies used in this type of research.
Part 1
In 750-1,000 words, choose and describe a Health Promotion Program or use the health prevention program you described in Levels of Prevention assignment. Your description should include:
Explain the problems the health promotion program is addressing.
Who is the target audience (include all relevant demographics)?
Discuss how sociocultural factors related to health seeking behaviors impact the target audience. Why is it important to be aware of this?
Describe how many people are served in this program.
Explain who is funding this program.
Discuss the basic tenets of the program.Part 2
In 750-1,000 words, design a program evaluation to assess its effectiveness.
Please include the following in your program evaluation design:
Evaluation questions.
Evaluation methods.
Identify stakeholders and discuss the possible issues you may encounter with each stakeholder and how to overcome those issues.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 5.3: Explain sociocultural factors related to health seeking behaviors.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Program Evaluation Assessment Benchmark Assignment