Project Planning Schedule and Cost Control
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Project Planning Schedule and Cost Control
?Course Description: Project Planning Schedule and Cost Control INS 412?
As per the course requirements, the syllabus, and as explained in the class, this subject involves a hands-on project that engages students in a project of their choice. Major concepts and applied skills are incorporated and developed within the context of the chosen project, preferably related to the current or prospective business focus.?
The project will be a rolling wave concept consisting of 3 parts?
Part One:?
Based on course outcomes?
Select a project preferably related to your current or prospective business focus and provide the following:?
Your project as a business case?
How your project is selected (organization project selection criteria)?
Define objectives, goals and requirements?
Preliminary scope statement?
High level work breakdown structure (WBS)?
Part Two:?
Based on course outcomes?
Base on your previous work in part one?
Provide the following:?
Detailed WBS?
Formulate your project team?
Provide a time management plan (schedule) with critical path using CPM based on resource pool and resource allocation?
Estimate costs and budget?
Time Management Plan?
Part Three?
Based on course outcomes?
Base on your previous work in part one and two?
Provide the following:?
Quality and Risk Management Plan?
Communication Plan?
Human Resource Plan?
Project Organizational Chart?
Project Implementation, Testing and Controlling.?
Project Poster.?
Note:?
1. This is not an individual project. Students must work in group of 2-3 members.?
2. Your final report must not exceed more than 3000 words including references and should not be less than 2500 words in total.?
3. Plagiarism: Project report must be submitted along with the similarity report and it should not be exceeded more than 10% at the time of submission.?
4. To avoid plagiarism appropriate references must be provided for all the sources used in the final report.?
5. Submission delays or any form of excuse would not be considered.?
6. The hardcopy of the project report and similarity must be submitted in person in my office before the deadline of the project mentioned above.?
7. Students presentation would be required for this project. The hardcopy of the project presentations must be submitted along with the project report.?
8. The project report must contain an appropriate title page, list of contents, introduction and conclusion before references.?
9. Students must use at least 15-20 references for this project.?
10. In case of any clarification required, please visit my office for further guidelines.?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Project Planning Schedule and Cost Control