Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
J Questions for Creative Thinking Assignment
1. Describe a period when you were active in a real-world organization and had to solve a problem or handle an issue. This could include volunteer, school, or other organizations, as well as employment difficulties. What was the final result, and might it have been handled differently? [1.1, 1.2, and 1 Learning Outcomes] .3]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
2. Tell us about a period when you worked for a professional, volunteer, or school-related organization that promoted and supported creative thinking. What steps were taken to encourage creativity? If you haven’t done so before, tell us about a moment when you tried to address a problem for an organization that you were a part of. What was the outcome? [Learning Objective 3] .1]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
3. Research a current political subject that interests you. Have you spotted any fallacies being utilized in political debates on this topic? Discuss a particular fallacy that has been utilized to defend a position on this topic. This isn’t meant to convey support or opposition to the position; rather, it’s a well-known fallacy that’s being used to back it up. [4.1, 4.2, and 4 Learning Outcomes] .3]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
4. Consider a period when you attempted to persuade someone that a creative concept was a good one. What was the situation, and what was the result? Would any of the techniques outlined in this lecture have been beneficial? [Successful Learning Outcome 7] .2]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
5. Consider a period when you were embroiled in an emotional dispute about a topic about which you were passionate. Describe the conditions of the talk without experiencing the feelings. Would you have been able to argue your position more effectively if emotions had not been involved? What was the upshot of the conversation, in any case? [2.1 and 2 Learning Outcomes] .2]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
6. As a student conducting research and producing papers, you may need to conduct research outside of the online library by conducting Internet searches from time to time. Perhaps you overheard someone in the media make a claim and decided to look into it further. This is a good example of when you would need to check the correctness and validity of your study results (i.e., the evidence). What other examples have you come across that you’ve considered to be good or awful information sources? How did you get to your conclusions about the accuracy and authenticity of the data? [Learning Objective 5] .1]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
7. Consider a period when you were a member of a high-performing team. How inventive was this group? Were any unethical or immoral behaviors made, without naming names? If it was the case, how did it affect team trust? If you haven’t worked on a high-functioning team before, consider any team you’ve worked with. Why wasn’t it a high-functioning machine? [6.1, 6.2, and 6 Learning Outcomes] .3]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
8. How will you put what you’ve learned in this course into practice at your present or future job? [Analysis of All Learning Outcomes]
At least 200 words must be written in your journal entry. There are no references or citations required.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
promoted and supported creative thinking |
promoted and supported creative thinking