Public Health Problem Qualitative Data and Reasoning Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Public Health Problem Qualitative Data and Reasoning Discussion
I’m working on a social science discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
#1 For the public health problem you have identified, describe whether you would collect qualitative data, quantitative data, or both. Provide a rationale for your response.
#2 Describe the two types of reasoning (inductive and deductive) and their role in the research process. Provide an example of how each type is applied to the public health problem you have identified.
Social Science Job Development Questions
I’m studying and need help with a Social Science question to help me learn.
you are a disability coach helping the disable get a job. Please answer question 1 and 2 attached some readings
Question One
Think about the ways you get to know individuals. Review the methods listed below” Which of the suggested methods do you use and why?
Visit the individual at his/her home
Talk about purposes of the assessment
Learn about his/her role in the family and community
Invite the individual to be with you during labor market screening and analysis of community jobs
Encourage the individual to participate in interesting or unfamiliar job analysis activities
Maintain frequent contact during assessment and job development activities
Question Two The 2nd question asks which of the above methods you do not use but believe some might be helpful?
Public Health Problem Qualitative Data and Reasoning Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Public Health Problem Qualitative Data and Reasoning Discussion
Public Health Problem Qualitative Data and Reasoning Discussion