Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Please read the questions on page 474 of your textbook under “Mind Stretching” (ISBN 9781138223684). Choose one of the five (5) questions and debate it. Please write out the question to which you will respond.
1.Pretend you’re part of a negotiation team with Chinese, Japanese, or Korean counterparts. Based on your personal tastes, what kinds of special challenges might you face? Which nationality would you find the most difficult to interact with successfully? Why?
2.Consider your own problem-solving style. Do you place a higher importance on values or objective data? How can you persuade someone who has a different point of view than you?
3.Consider your personal communication style. Do you like to just state your opinion based on evidence? Do you strive to get along with others by “softening” your message and being willing to make concessions? Is one method superior to the other?
4.How vital is it for you to gain a better understanding of Asian cultures, languages, negotiation methods, and business practices?
5.How would you establish guanxi ties in China? What are the similarities and differences between relationship-building in China and Japan or Korea?
Explain your solution to the question you’re responding to using your readings from Chapter 14.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Question about Asian Cultures and Languages |
Question about Asian Cultures and Languages